CRS | CERES Regulatory Services

40

Hello Regulatory Scientists,

Today, let’s explore the journey of Zydelig (idelalisib) from receiving an FDA Complete Response Letter (CRL) to achieving approval. This case study
provides valuable insights and lessons that can guide companies developing new drugs today.

Regulatory History and Initial Submission

Drug: Zydelig (idelalisib)
Mechanism of Action: PI3K delta inhibitor, which helps to inhibit the growth and survival of cancer cells
Indication: Treatment of relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), follicular B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (FL) and small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL)
Initial Submission Date: September 2013

The Complete Response Letter (CRL)

CRL Date: February 2014

CRL Concerns:

  1. Infection Risks: The FDA raised concerns about the increased risk of serious and potentially fatal infections observed in clinical trials.
  2. Hepatotoxicity: Concerns about liver toxicity and the need for more comprehensive liver function monitoring.
  3. Pneumonitis: Cases of pneumonitis observed during trials required further investigation.
  4. Long-term Safety Data: Request for additional long-term safety data to better understand the drug’s risk profile.

Resubmission Strategy

Gilead Sciences, the company behind Zydelig, implemented a comprehensive strategy to address the FDA’s concerns:

  1. Enhanced Safety Monitoring: Implemented more rigorous safety monitoring protocols to manage infection risks, hepatotoxicity, and
    pneumonitis.
  2. Additional Clinical Data: Conducted further studies and analyses to gather more robust long-term safety data.
  3. Revised Risk Management Plans: Developed detailed risk management strategies, including patient education and monitoring
    guidelines.
  4. Continuous FDA Engagement: Maintained open communication with the FDA to ensure alignment on the resubmission strategy and clarify
    any outstanding questions.

Resubmission Date: April 2014

Outcome

Approval Date: July 2014

Zydelig was approved for the treatment of relapsed CLL, FL, and SLL, with specific requirements for post-marketing studies to monitor long-term safety.

Lessons Learned

The journey of Zydelig from CRL to approval highlights several key lessons for drug developers:

  1. Robust Safety Monitoring: Implementing rigorous safety monitoring protocols is crucial to managing and mitigating risks, particularly for serious adverse events.
  2. Comprehensive Data Collection: Providing extensive long-term safety data is essential to addressing the FDA’s concerns and ensuring patient safety.
  3. Effective Risk Management: Developing and implementing detailed risk management strategies can help mitigate identified risks and demonstrate a commitment to patient safety.
  4. Continuous FDA Engagement: Maintaining open and ongoing communication with the FDA helps align development efforts with regulatory expectations.
  5. Utilizing Advisory Committees: Leveraging advisory committees can provide valuable feedback and support the resubmission process.

Relevance for Current Drug Developers

For companies developing drugs today, the Zydelig case underscores the importance of strategic planning and meticulous safety monitoring in the regulatory process. Here are some takeaways to help avoid a CRL and achieve first-cycle approval:

  1. Thorough Pre-Submission Preparation: Ensure that all aspects of your submission, including safety data
    and monitoring protocols, meet FDA standards.
  2. Proactive Risk Management: Identify and address potential risks early in the development process to prevent issues from arising during FDA review.
  3. Engage with the FDA Early and
    Often
    : Regular interactions with the FDA can provide valuable guidance and help steer the development process.
  4. Utilize Advisory Committees: Seek feedback from advisory committees to validate data and address potential concerns.
  5. Invest in Quality Data: Prioritize the collection of high-quality, detailed safety and efficacy data to support the submission.

By learning from the Zydelig resubmission experience, current drug developers can better navigate the regulatory landscape, avoid common pitfalls, and increase the likelihood of a successful first review cycle approval.

Stay diligent and strategic,

CERES Regulatory Services