Our Blog

Welcome to the CERES Regulatory Services blog! Here, you’ll find a wide range of articles and resources on Accelerated Approval Pathways and FDA Fast Track Designation, FDA Breakthrough Therapy Designation, FDA Priority Review Designation, FDA Approval Process, Regulatory Strategy for Therapeutics (Drugs, Biologics, Vaccines, Medical Devices, Cell and Gene Therapy and Advanced Tissue Products), Nonclinical Development, Clinical Development, FDA Meetings, Drug Development Pathways, Expedited Drug Approval, Innovative Therapies Development, NDA and BLA Submission Strategies, FDA Regulatory Guidance, FDA Accelerated and Expedited programs and Strategies of Interest to the Regulatory Scientist.

The Zolgensma Resubmission Journey: From FDA CRL to Approval

Hello Regulatory Scientists, 

Today, let’s delve into the journey of Zolgensma (onasemnogene abeparvovec) from receiving an FDA Complete Response Letter (CRL) to achieving approval. This case study provides valuable insights and lessons that can guide companies developing new drugs today. 

Regulatory History and Initial Submission 

Drug: Zolgensma (onasemnogene abeparvovec) 
Mechanism of Action: Gene therapy that delivers a functional copy of the SMN1 gene to motor neuron cells, which helps produce the survival motor neuron (SMN) protein 
Indication: Treatment of spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) in pediatric patients under two years of age 
Initial Submission Date: October 2018 

The Complete Response Letter (CRL) 

CRL Date: December 2018 
CRL Concerns

  1. Manufacturing Issues: The FDA raised concerns about the quality and consistency of the manufacturing process. 
  1. Vector Shedding: Concerns regarding the shedding of the viral vector used in the gene therapy and its potential impact on safety. 
  1. Additional Data Requirements: Request for more detailed analyses and data to support the efficacy and safety of the therapy. 

Resubmission Strategy 

Novartis, the company behind Zolgensma, implemented a comprehensive strategy to address the FDA’s concerns: 

  1. Manufacturing Process Improvements: Made significant improvements to the manufacturing process to ensure consistency and quality. 
  1. Enhanced Quality Control Measures: Established stricter quality control measures to address concerns related to vector shedding and overall safety. 
  1. Additional Clinical Data: Conducted further studies and analyses to provide more robust data on the efficacy and safety of Zolgensma. 
  1. Continuous FDA Engagement: Maintained open lines of communication with the FDA to ensure alignment on the resubmission strategy and clarify any outstanding questions. 

Resubmission Date: February 2019 

Outcome 

Approval Date: May 2019 
Zolgensma was approved for the treatment of spinal muscular atrophy in pediatric patients under two years of age, offering a groundbreaking gene therapy option for this devastating condition. 

Lessons Learned 

The journey of Zolgensma from CRL to approval highlights several key lessons for drug developers: 

  1. Addressing Manufacturing Issues: Ensuring the quality and consistency of the manufacturing process is crucial. Proactive improvements and rigorous quality control measures can prevent setbacks. 
  1. Comprehensive Data Collection: Providing extensive clinical data to support the efficacy and safety profile of the therapy is essential to addressing FDA concerns. 
  1. Effective Risk Management: Developing and implementing a detailed risk management plan can help mitigate potential adverse effects and ensure patient safety. 
  1. Continuous FDA Engagement: Maintaining open and ongoing communication with the FDA helps align development efforts with regulatory expectations. 
  1. Leveraging Advisory Committees: Engaging with advisory committees can provide valuable feedback and support the resubmission process, even if not formally required. 

Relevance for Current Drug Developers 

For companies developing drugs today, the Zolgensma case underscores the importance of strategic planning and meticulous attention to detail in the regulatory process. Here are some takeaways to help avoid a CRL and achieve first-cycle approval: 

  1. Thorough Pre-Submission Preparation: Ensure that all aspects of your submission, particularly manufacturing processes and clinical data, meet FDA standards. 
  1. Proactive Risk Management: Identify and address potential risks early in the development process to prevent issues from arising during FDA review. 
  1. Engage with the FDA Early and Often: Regular interactions with the FDA can provide valuable guidance and help steer the development process. 
  1. Invest in Quality Data: Prioritize the collection of high-quality, detailed safety and efficacy data to support the submission. 
  1. Utilize Advisory Committees: Seek feedback from advisory committees to validate data and address potential concerns, even if formal hearings are not required. 

By learning from the Zolgensma resubmission experience, current drug developers can better navigate the regulatory landscape, avoid common pitfalls, and increase the likelihood of a successful first review cycle approval. 

Stay diligent and strategic, 

CERES Regulatory Services